Ceramic Vs Live Rock

Ceramic rings can hold a second beneficial bacteria.

Ceramic vs live rock.

Some manufacturers moved from the lava grate system because the lava rock would crumble and leave a mess in the grill. You won t find this bacteria in plastic or foam filter media. The ceramic briquette was introduced to replace the lava rock as a cleaner more heat retentive alternative. These bacteria eat nitrates and will only survive where there is no oxygen present.

3 it is used to improve the tumbling action in the tumbler barrel. Since the withdrawal of reef ceramics from the american aquarium market there has been a void of ceramic reef structures available to reef aquarists but these new pieces from cerameco are not only more interesting but. 2 it is used to cushion fragile rock materials during the tumbling process. And 4 it is used as a filler to make up for lost volume after the coarse grit and medium grit steps.

In its natural state it is very porous and will readily absorb liquids and staining agents. Ceramic is made from clay and sediments which are baked hard in a kiln. Yes i do agree that they do catch a lot of junk because stirring or moving them stir up a lot of green water. In addition to launching their live rock replacement vida rock cerameco has also develoepd techniques for producing large handmade ceramic reefscapes and backgrounds.

Ceramic briquettes vs lava rock. Denitrifying bacteria live deep inside rock ceramic and other porous materials where oxygen cannot reach them. Unglazed materials are usually chosen over more durable options because of the. Other manufacturers found that to get the same vaporizing flavors from the lava they.

This can be prevented to some extent by sealing the floor with a quality chemical ceramic tile sealer. Ok everybody condemn bio balls and ceramic rings as detritus catchments tools and creating a nitrate factory.